Re: Making sense of the SQL trace file

From: Paul Brewer <paul_at_paul.brewers.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 18:56:42 -0000
Message-ID: <3c19968f_2@mk-nntp-1.news.uk.worldonline.com>

You do indeed enjoy extreme tests :-0

Attended and very much enjoyed your presentation in Birmingham yesterday. Keep up the good work.

Paul

"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:1008243563.27029.0.nnrp-01.9e984b29_at_news.demon.co.uk...
>
> It wasn't quite that obscure - I had done a pl/sql
> loop with a single row fetch, and every single one
> took 291 microseconds. So then I checked a
> few of the larger numbers.
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Lewis
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
>
> Host to The Co-Operative Oracle Users' FAQ
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
>
> Author of:
> Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases
>
> Screen saver or Life saver: http://www.ud.com
> Use spare CPU to assist in cancer research.
>
> Howard J. Rogers wrote in message
> <3c13c11d$0$3740$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au>...
> >I just want to know what sort of inspiration struck to make you realise
> that
> >they were all multiples of 291!!
> >
> >I mean, I know if I ever saw a time reading 24735, the last thing I'd say
> to
> >myself is, 'Hello! That looks like a multiple of 291 to me!!'.
> >
> >:-)
>
>
>
Received on Thu Dec 13 2001 - 12:56:42 CST