Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: RAID: Advantage or disaster?

Re: RAID: Advantage or disaster?

From: Geoff Reader <grr_at_NOSPAM.bton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 13:07:22 +0000
Message-ID: <3C0F6D8A.D5D85CF5@NOSPAM.bton.ac.uk>


Doh, sorry not paying attention.

DROP TABLE tot_read_writes;

 CREATE TABLE tot_read_writes
  AS SELECT SUM(phyrds) phys_reads, sum(phywrts) phys_wrts

        FROM V$FILESTAT; should preced my query. Thats what comes of trying to simplify things....

Geoff
Geoff Reader
University of Brighton

John Jones wrote:
>
> tried your SQL, what is the tot_read_writes table ??????
>
> --
> John Jones
> Senior Oracle DBA
> Duke University, OIT
> john.jones_at_duke.edu
> "Geoff Reader" <grr_at_NOSPAM.bton.ac.uk> wrote in message
> news:3C0E1EF9.2EE88241_at_NOSPAM.bton.ac.uk...
> > We had similar problems with a database here, that had all the data
> > files on the same filesystem.
> > If you look at File IO, you may find its one file causing most of the
> > bottleneck. In our case it was TEMP.
> > So we moved this onto another filesystem (not raided incidentally as its
> > write intensive). And no more problems...
> > Heres teh File IO SQL to be run as system, it works on 7.3.4 and I think
> > on 8i, I'm not certain of that mind.
> > Good luck.
> >
> >
> > SELECT name, phyrds, phyrds * 100 / trw.phys_reads read_pct,
> > phywrts, phywrts * 100 / trw.phys_wrts write_pct,
> > db.tablespace_name
> > FROM tot_read_writes trw, v$datafile df, v$filestat
> > fs,dba_data_files db
> > WHERE df.file# = fs.file#
> > and df.file# = file_id
> >
> > Geoff
> > Geoff Reader
> > University of Brighton
> >
> > Andy Kent wrote:
> > >
> > > What do people think about the use of RAID for an IDS database these
> days?
> > > Better, worse, or about the same on balance as JABOD? Any RAID levels to
> > > prefer / avoid?
> > >
> > > A client of mine is running RAID 5 on Compaq, and is getting 100% disk
> i/o
> > > and frequent crashes. I haven't been able to look closely enough to
> > > establish whether it's the RAID 5 that's causing this, but anyway
> they're
> > > moving to a bigger box and planning to go RAID 5 again.
> > >
> > > Conventional wisdom and past experience tells me this would be a
> disaster.
> > > Has the technology moved on so as to tip the scales?
> > >
> > > --
> > > -Andy Kent-
> > > Bristol, England
> > >
> > > Remove '.DontSpamMe' from return address to respond.
Received on Thu Dec 06 2001 - 07:07:22 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US