Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Locally Managed vs Dictionary managed tablespaces

Re: Locally Managed vs Dictionary managed tablespaces

From: Norman Dunbar <Norman.Dunbar_at_lfs.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:23:48 -0000
Message-ID: <E2F6A70FE45242488C865C3BC1245DA72D5F81@lnewton.leeds.lfs.co.uk>


Thanks Howard, I knew there would be a good reason.

Cheers,
Norman.

PS. Found Harbord yet :o)



Norman Dunbar			EMail:	Norman.Dunbar_at_LFS.co.uk
Database/Unix administrator	Phone:	0113 289 6265
				Fax:	0113 289 3146
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.	URL:	http://www.Lynx-FS.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----

From: Howard J. Rogers [mailto:howardjr_at_www.com] Posted At: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:42 AM Posted To: server
Conversation: Locally Managed vs Dictionary managed tablespaces Subject: Re: Locally Managed vs Dictionary managed tablespaces

No, PCT_FULL is the fullness percentage of the data file as it is currently
sized. PCT_UTIL is the percentage full of what the file could possibly grow to be -it takes account of autoextend and any possible maxssize clause.

I can only show you the following screen dump to assure you that the columns
are not the same at all:
<SNIP> Received on Fri Nov 02 2001 - 05:23:48 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US