Re: Sybrand Bakker

I'll take a correct answer over a politely worded red-herring, any day!

FaheemRao wrote:

> It would be appreciated that if Sybrand answer newbies in a polite way.!
>
> Faheem Rao
>
> "Schemrooster" <WAGates_at_Microsoft.com> wrote in message news:<3bdf43ab$0$1509$e4fe514c_at_newszilla.xs4all.nl>...
> > Koert,
> >
> > When someone is answering 290 messages (just counted) that *is* his life. I
> > don't know anyone that patient to answer (sometimes totally trivial)
> > questions that much.
> >
> > I'm glad that there are people on the *net willing to help others, that
> > saved me a lot of headache in the past.
> >
> > Sybrand, keep up the good work. You're much appreciated among us *newbies*.
> >
> > Newbie
> > "koert54" <koert54_at_nospam.com> wrote in message
> > news:nqED7.2792$vL2.464_at_afrodite.telenet-ops.be...
> > > Looks like a clash between ego's - this is just pathetic ... it's just a
> > > newsgroup boys & girls - have some fun in life - or get a life
> > >
> > > koert
> > >
> > > "Roel Toledo" <dontsendmailstome_at_bogusmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:REyD7.148122$3d2.5095965_at_bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > >
> > > > > Sybrand merely vocalises this, some one should, some one needs to.
> > > > > There are world experts in this group I for one do not want anybody,
> > > > > especially someone as knowledgeable as Sybrand castigated for pointing
> > out
> > > > > the wurd of the group to beginners.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I agree but I pity the newbies either for being castigated for acting
> > the
> > > > way they would. Remember that they are newbies -- they are bound to
> > commit
> > > > mistakes; they don't know where to look for previous discussions; they
> > don't
> > > > know how to phrase their questions; they do not know the structure of
> > the
> > > > documention or manual and they surely would ask stupid questions. But I
> > > > tend to be forgiving. Great DBA's do not bark nor frown at them at every
> > > > mistake they make.
> > > >
> > > > Roel
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
Received on Thu Nov 01 2001 - 16:07:36 CST