You can quite happily achieve the same thing on win2k.
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission Uk
"Schemrooster" <WAGates_at_Microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3bdf40ef$0$1524$e4fe514c_at_newszilla.xs4all.nl...
> Try the same on Linux and use different user (usr8i, usr9i etc) You'll
Love
> it. Completely separated.
>
> P.
>
> "Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr_at_www.com> wrote in message
> news:3bddb5cc$0$21541$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> > Chris: I have W2K, which is NT-ish I suppose. It's currently running
> 8.1.6,
> > 8.1.7 and 9.0.1.1, all without any trouble at all. The new home issue
is
> > important, and I installed in the order I've just listed, and I wouldn't
> > like to try it in any other order. Other than that, the only think I
have
> > to keep my wits about is working with things like exp/imp.... since 9i
was
> > the last one installed, it tends to get treated as the default, and 9i
> > version of exp doesn't exactly work terribly well with an 816 database!
> >
> > Regards
> > HJR
> > --
> >
> > Oracle Resources : http://www.geocities.com/howardjr2000
> > ========================================
> >
> >
> > "Chris S" <cschofie_at_nospam.slip.net> wrote in message
> > news:c82rttgg3gu550ron9qfpk1q233040n9o4_at_4ax.com...
> > > I want to test 9i, but don't have a spare server right now.
> > >
> > > Assuming I install into a new home, will I get away with this - on a
> > > server that has 8.1.7 currently?
> > >
> > > Thanks, Chris
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Wed Oct 31 2001 - 04:29:35 CST
