Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: SHared REALM Memory ....... ORA817R3

Re: SHared REALM Memory ....... ORA817R3

From: Schemrooster <WAGates_at_Microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 01:01:02 +0100
Message-ID: <3bdf4020$0$1525$e4fe514c@newszilla.xs4all.nl>


It's only a development platform. Small database to test COM+, CLX and CORBA components.

And it's working. RAM in Holland isn't expensive either but it's an IBM. That costs a little more (Grin)

Cya
P.
"Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr_at_www.com> wrote in message news:3bdf3918$0$3561$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> Crikey! 8.1.7 on 64Mb is pushing it a bit (as you discovered). You'll
love
> 9i -the recommendation is for 512Mb!!
>
> If this is a test platform -and I sincerely hope that's all it is!! ;-) -,
> I'd strongly recommend rushing out and purchasing enough RAM to push you
up
> to 256Mb. Here in Australia that's selling for a crazy $55 or so. Makes
> things much more workable, even when just testing.
>
> Regards
> HJR
> --
>
> Oracle Resources : http://www.geocities.com/howardjr2000
> ========================================
>
>
> "Schemrooster" <WAGates_at_Microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:3bdf36af$0$1541$e4fe514c_at_newszilla.xs4all.nl...
> > Howard,
> >
> > Thanx for your quick response. After inserting another 64Mb the problem
> was
> > solved. (Even manually stopping and starting services is working) It's
> > running ok now on 128Mb.
> >
> > Thanx for your reply,
> >
> > Peter
> > "Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr_at_www.com> wrote in message
> > news:3bdf34e5$0$3561$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> > > I think that error usually indicates that the service hasn't started,
or
> > > (rather more precisely) that the service has not *completed* its
startup
> > > routine.
> > >
> > > Certainly, I can simulate the same error by (a) stopping my 817
service
> > then
> > > (b) restarting the service but (c) immediately issuing the connect /
as
> > > sysdba command in a SQL Plus session -i.e., without waiting for the
> > service
> > > restart to finish.
> > >
> > > The question would therefore really boil down to what happens when you
> > > manually restart the service (and I'm talking about the
> > "OracleServiceXXXX"
> > > one). Does it restart without a problem? Does it keel over? What
does
> > the
> > > alert log record if it does keel over?
> > >
> > > The database creation assistant does its stuff by re-starting
instances,
> > so
> > > I think in future, if it happens, just try doing that directly with
the
> > > services applet, and seeing what happens.
> > >
> > > How much memory does this box have, by the way? And what settings for
> the
> > > various bits of the SGA did you have when the problem first
materialised
> > > (its possible the assistant set them back to smaller defaults, and
thus
> > > allowed things to start again).
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > HJR
> > > --
> > >
> > > Oracle Resources : http://www.geocities.com/howardjr2000
> > > ========================================
> > >
> > >
> > > "Schemrooster" <WAGates_at_Microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > > news:3bdf3274$0$1507$e4fe514c_at_newszilla.xs4all.nl...
> > > > Hi there,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry if this question was posted already, but i wasn't paying much
> > > > attention.
> > > > I have a problem with ORACLE 8.1.7. on W2K
> > > >
> > > > I have a "standard" Database created on my server, and everything
went
> > > > smoothly. But after 13 days I got the message "Shared Realm Memory
> > doesn't
> > > > exist, ORACLE not available" when i tried to connect with SQL_Plus.
> > > >
> > > > Rebooting the server had the same result... Nothing
> > > >
> > > > After I started the Database creation tool and said "Edit" and
changed
> > > > nothing, but went through all the screens, ORACLE was up and running
> > > again.
> > > > Can someone please explain this to me? I'm puzzled.
> > > >
> > > > Thanx in_at_vance
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Tue Oct 30 2001 - 18:01:02 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US