Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: ASP/OraOLEDB performance

Re: ASP/OraOLEDB performance

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-family_at_home.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 12:40:39 GMT
Message-ID: <bFyB7.45366$Zb.22542367@news1.sttln1.wa.home.com>


Are you using host variables? (probably not). Do you maintain the connection or do you open it up each time you do a query?
Try not using MTS and use a dedicated server connection. Jim
"Mark Weaver" <mark_at_npsl.co.uk> wrote in message news:c0oB7.58471$uh1.6356785_at_news6-win.server.ntlworld.com...
> Thus far, I have got terrible performance out of Oracle. Using Oracle
> 8.1.7.5, plus OraOLEDB 8.1.7.2. I can't find any later 8.1.7 patches -
> please let me know if I'm missing something.
>
> The scenario is:
>
> COM object implemented in VB+ADO+OraOLEDB for storing session data.
> ASP page requested retrieves a BLOB containing the session data (via ADO
> with server side recordsets) and reads this into a dictionary.
> BLOB is typically 4K.
>
> Connecting to a fairly well spec'd DB (7x10,000 RPM SCSI disks with
> index/data/logs/os/redo spread about, dual PIII-800Mhz CPUs, 1GB) from
> a-hopefully-up-to-the job webserver (2xPII 450Mhz CPUs, 1GB) which doesn't
> seem too stressed, then I get massive memory usage (~100Mb) with only
about
> 12 pages/second. Now with the same running under SQL server I get much
> better than this, so I assume that I'm missing something. Oracle is
running
> in MTS mode to support the apparently very large number of connections
> created by the webserver (typically around 500). For comparison purposes,
I
> have a C/OCI app running in the webserver that uses persistent
connections,
> applies DB based security to every request received and gets around 200
> pages/second - nearly 20x the performance).
>
> Now my questions are:
>
> 1) Why are there so many connections?
> 2) Why is the performance so poor?
> 3) What can I do to improve on this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
>
Received on Wed Oct 24 2001 - 07:40:39 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US