Re: Oracle versus MS Sql Server

I WAS an oracle-fan but i am shocked after I installed the version 8.1.7 with OEM 2.2. I have never seen such an unreasonable demand for the customers. This slow and unstable java-shit is not for PROFESSIONAL use. I am sorry, but I am not able to recommend Oracle as a professional tool any longer.  

Try to start the Database Configuration Assistant. It will start only, if Java like it. Sometimes it starts, the other times nothing happens. The same problem during opening Databases using OEM 2.2. Sometimes it works, other times the Connection Window disappear in the great Java-Nirvana without saying good-bye to anyone.
To the great product IFS, I can say: WOW... IBS were the better name: Internet-Bugfile-System.

I am not an Microsoft-fan but this new Java-Based Oracle-Versions aren't the products I am expecting from Oracle.

Dirk Drexler

"Michael G. Schneider" <mgs_at_mgs-software.de> wrote in message news:9qnaar$kfs$05$1_at_news.t-online.com...

>
> "David Fitzjarrell" <oratune_at_msn.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:32d39fb1.0110180722.57e2052c_at_posting.google.com...
> > Of course, a quick read of the pre-installation checklist would help
> tremendously...
>
> One of the things I found the hard way, was the following:
>
> If you do a standard installation of Oracle 8.1.7 under Windows 2000 and
> then want to use the Management Server, you will have to change
>
> SQLNET.AUTHENTICATION_SERVICE=(NTS)
>
> to
>
> SQLNET.AUTHENTICATION_SERVICE=()
>
> which, in spite of intensive reading I did not find in the pre-installation
> checklist. If you are able to do so, please show me the appropriate place on
> the CD. Of course, my next question would then be, why it is only documented
> but not implemented.
>
> Michael G. Schneider

-- 
Posted from test2.fin-rlp.de [212.7.174.98] 
via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG