Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle versus MS Sql Server

Re: Oracle versus MS Sql Server

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:25:27 +0100
Message-ID: <3bd3e605$0$8511$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


"Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr_at_www.com> wrote in message news:3bd081ea_at_news.iprimus.com.au...
> I wanted to test something on 8.1.6 yesterday -which was a bit of a shame
> because I'd migrated to 9i. So I formatted my hard drive, installed
Windows
> 2000 Advanced Server, and proceeded to install 8.1.6, 8.1.7 and 9.0.1.1
one
> after the other, and had the entire machine rebuilt and in working order,
> with not a configuration problem in sight, and with three different
> databases under three different versions, in about 3.5 hours.
>
> That strikes me as a pretty smooth installation, and a pretty sound
product.
>

Now if only I could get 9.0.1.1 to actually create a database!

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
Received on Mon Oct 22 2001 - 04:25:27 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US