Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: perplexing problem....

Re: perplexing problem....

From: Mark Townsend <markbtownsend_at_home.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:27:40 GMT
Message-ID: <B7CEA22C.1456B%markbtownsend@home.com>


in article 3BA8D870.FF6F32EA_at_dced.state.ak.us, Calvin Crumrine at Calvin_Crumrine_at_dced.state.ak.us wrote on 9/19/01 10:40 AM:

> Personally, I prefer efficiency in coding/maintenance over efficiency in RAM
> and
> CPU cycles and bind variables always seemed complicated to me. I find it
> cheaper to
> add RAM and CPU cycles than to hire another programmer. Of course it all
> depends on
> how you measure efficiency-I think of it in terms of budget impact. How can I
> get
> the most work done with the smallest budget?
>
> I think bind variables are fine in stable apps, but not necessarily in all
> apps.

Well - you are entitled to your own opinion, but this is sorta like buying a car with manual transmission and refusing to shift out of second. The only time it doesn't make sense to use a bind variable is if you have significant skew in an indexed column and are using histograms to alert the optimizer to the fact (and even this is now largely mitigated in Oracle9i). And in fact, bind variable are such a Good Thing (TM) that in later versions (8.1.6+, 9i), the engine will actually turn all your constants into bind variables for you - so NO development impact !! Received on Wed Sep 19 2001 - 21:27:40 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US