Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Back to the future

Re: Back to the future

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:49:54 +0100
Message-ID: <999694015.24843.0.nnrp-08.9e984b29@news.demon.co.uk>

You could set up logminer and start investigating the redo log files, looking for actions that DELETE from TAB$ and OBJ$.

OBJ$ shows the name (possibly as a hex dump), and then you can find the matching obj# from TAB$ (definitely as a hex dump), and these give you the SCN you are interested in.

--
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Host to The Co-Operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html

Author of:
Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases

Screen saver or Life saver: http://www.ud.com
Use spare CPU to assist in cancer research.

Dino Hsu wrote in message ...

>Dear all,
>
>I've just studied the backup and recovery part, and I learned about
>the incomplete recovery and realize that the database can roll forward
>from a baseline backup using log files, this is like 'going back to
>the future'. We can issue 'recover database until canel' to roll
>forward to a point in time. However, without 'WYSWYG' and 'rewind'
>functions, I would assume it's difficult to reach the exact point in
>time. For example, your user tells you he inadvertently dropped a
>table at around 10:00, but nobody knows the exact time, when you
>recover to the 10:00 point, you cannot see the data on the run because
>the database is not opened yet. If the actual time is 09:50, and you
>open the database at the 10:00 point (resetlog), only to see the table
>is still missing, you can do nothing except to start over again. This
>is just like when the police is investigating on a robery case, they
>check the video tape trying to get to the point in time, with 'WYSWYG'
>and forward/backward functions, it's quite easy. But without 'WYSWYG'
>and backward functions, it's time-consuming to narrow the way down
>there.
>
>I am bothered by this thought, anyone enlightens me? Thanks in
>advance.
>
>Dino
>
Received on Wed Sep 05 2001 - 07:49:54 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US