Re: 8.1.7 cache buffer chains contention

From: Scott Gamble <zifnab_at_NOSPAM.reddragon.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:05:34 GMT
Message-ID: <OE6j7.1062$Kf.711028@e3500-chi1.usenetserver.com>

Sorry about that confusion, the index was rebuilt over the weekend.

and you are correct with your file number, and block number its now 288 and 256003. Sorry about that, forgot we rebuilt the indexes over the weekend.

"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in <999039991.23184.0.nnrp-12.9e984b29_at_news.demon.co.uk>:

>Sorry about the dump file size - I wasn't
>expecting it to do full leaf dumps. That
>must have changed since 8.1.5.
>
>The interesting thing is that I think your dump
>is showing your root block at
> 0x4803e803
>which is block number 3e803 (256003) of
>a file whose number I can't work out but which
>is greater than 64 (possibly 288).
>
Received on Wed Aug 29 2001 - 09:05:34 CDT