Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Expert scoffs at Autonomy software

Re: Expert scoffs at Autonomy software

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:14:28 +0100
Message-ID: <3b864525$0$8510$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


Yes she used the word 'aboutness' in anger. English as she is spoke indeed.

If you wish comments on the opinions she holds from qualified people I suggest you try a newsgroup dedicated to search technologies not to the Oracle RDBMS.

"CorporateInfo" <TelegraphHillSF_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:444ff1cb.0108232038.3ccaa5b9_at_posting.google.com...
> At Genentech headquarters today in South San Francisco, there was a
> seminar on "Metadata & Controlled Vocabularies: What Are they and What
> is their Value?" given by Amy Warner, faculty member in Information
> Architecture at UMichigan, Genentech's consultant on taxonomy creation
> and a well-known corporate consultant on information technology. Dr.
> Warner had a final slide with "Autonomy"and "Semio" written on it, and
> here's what she said:
>
> "I always get asked, aren't there automated tools to build
> taxonomies? There is some 'Hiearchy Generation Software' available,
> but it generally relies on the principal of Collocation, not
> aboutness, which is preferable. Collocation simply means statistical
> clustering. Two examples are Autonomy and Semio. Beware of these.
> They don't work very well. They make many promises, but Collocation
> only works some of the time. I shouldn't bash, but I haven't talked
> to a company yet that likes Autonomy, including those that have bought
> it. In many cases they are overselling their product."
>
> Any reaction?
Received on Fri Aug 24 2001 - 07:14:28 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US