Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Using multiple buffer pools

Re: Using multiple buffer pools

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:13:28 +0100
Message-ID: <996257442.5451.0.nnrp-10.9e984b29@news.demon.co.uk>

I would usually expect to assign a few special objects to the KEEP pool, a few to the RECYCLE pool, and leave most in the DEFAULT pool.

--
Jonathan Lewis

Host to The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html

Author of:
Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases
See http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/book_rev.html

Seminars on getting the best out of Oracle
See http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html

Screensaver or Lifesaver: http://www.ud.com
Use spare CPU to assist in cancer research.




Chuck Hamilton wrote in message ...

>What is the best way to use multiple buffer pools? Should most
>segments still be assigned to this pool? Or should most be assinged to
>either KEEP or RECYCLE depending on object usage?
>
>I currently have everything in the DEFAULT pool with about a dozen
>segments assigned to KEEP. The KEEP pool size is slighly larger than
>the sum of the blocks used by those objects. Those objects are tables
>that are scanned very frequently but are small in size. Is this a good
>usage of multiple buffer pools?
>--
>Chuck Hamilton
>chuck_hamilton_at_yahoo.com
>
>"Do not be deceived, God is not mocked;
>for whatever a man sows, this he will also
>reap." (Gal 6:7 NASB)
Received on Fri Jul 27 2001 - 13:13:28 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US