Re: What is Parallel DML?

On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk wrote:

> Another factor which could help to explain the
> difference, though:
> The serial scan may have found numerous blocks
> in the buffer already, and therefore had to skip them
> on the serial scan, hence producing much smaller
> multiblock reads.

I don't understand this one. Shouldn't skipping them because they are in memory speed the single cpu query up?

-- 
Galen Boyer
It seems to me, I remember every single thing I know.