Re: SQL Server vs Oracle

From: Jon K <jon.dotonline_at_excitedot.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 22:11:50 GMT
Message-ID: <GEaW6.32798$G45.1385111@news1.onlynews.com>

In my experience SQl server is hampered by it's (only) platform. NT/2k doesn't scale very well, and it hurts SQL as a result. If you are already running Oracle on an NT box, you don't lose much by going to MS-SQL. Except freedom because now you are locked into MS forever...

JKL "scott felten" <sfelten_at_ipsos-asi.com> wrote in message news:56e9c9f0.0106130735.3a292650_at_posting.google.com...
> Our company is fustrated by Oracles enormous licensing costs and we
> are looking at SQL Server. What would we loose by going to SQL
> Server? Or what are some links that talk to this subject.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Scott Felten
Received on Thu Jun 14 2001 - 17:11:50 CDT