Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: feature & performance comparison

Re: feature & performance comparison

From: Obnoxio The Clown <obnoxio_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 20:19:34 +0100
Message-ID: <992028033.1727511758@news.cis.dfn.de>

On Fri, 08 Jun 2001, Mark Townsend wrote:
>in article a59bd1d2.0106071150.4cca1d15_at_posting.google.com, swp at
>DSAsteve_at_aol.com wrote on 6/7/01 12:50 PM:
>
>> I am posting this to both the Oracle and DB2 newsgroups in the hopes
>> that I will get a better set of answers.
>>
>> I would like to see a comparison of features that are in Oracle 9i and
>> the latest version of DB2. I have heard that DB2 is blowing Oracle
>> away right now, at least until the middle/end of summer. [I can't
>> remember where I read that review.] An objective comparison by an
>> independent third party would be best, of course. Or if anyone out
>> there has already done one for themselves that would be appreciated as
>> well. Just a comparison of the features, not what they can or should
>> be used to do or when or under what circumstances ~ that leads to
>> individual opinion creeping in too much.
>>
>> I would also like a performance comparison of the two. How they stack
>> on up similar machines with similar user loads across a wide variety
>> of platforms. I am sure that someone has already done this, perhaps
>> the Gartner Group, but I cannot find an honest "apples to apples"
>> comparison anywhere.
>
>This WILL be fun. Who's going to fire the first shot ?

Well, I thought he used the words "objective" and "Gartner" in the same context. :-) Received on Fri Jun 08 2001 - 14:19:34 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US