Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: feature & performance comparison

Re: feature & performance comparison

From: Obnoxio The Clown <obnoxio_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 20:16:07 +0100
Message-ID: <992027897.1213837428@news.cis.dfn.de>

On Fri, 08 Jun 2001, Jim Kennedy wrote:
>Flame war brewing.
>I did notice on the Oracle site an article stating that IBM showed off their
>new servers by using Oracle to get some great tpc-c benchmark numbers. The
>article goes on to wonder why they did not use DB2 (fair question).
>
>Draw your own conclusions.

Oh, come on! If IBM use DB2 for benchmarks, then other vendors say: "See, you're locked in to IBM". If they use some other vendor's software, then other vendors say: "See, DB2 doesn't perform well, that's why they use Sybase (or whatever)".

It's one or the other, surely? Received on Fri Jun 08 2001 - 14:16:07 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US