Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Misleading "view" ALL_JOBS - really a synonym to USER_JOBS

Re: Misleading "view" ALL_JOBS - really a synonym to USER_JOBS

From: Joe Belka <joe.belka_at_nospam.ntlworld.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 15:02:55 +0100
Message-ID: <km6S6.14649$%_1.2555137@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com>

AFAIK, only the user who submitted the job can perform operations on it. Even a user with the DBA privilege cannot remove another users job. So ALL_JOBS seems redundant to me.

Joe Belka.

"Vsevolod Afanassiev" <vafanassiev_at_aapt.com.au> wrote in message news:4f7d504c.0106020234.1e968812_at_posting.google.com...
> Normally, ALL_something, DBA_something, and USER_something are 3
> different views, but not for jobs (DBMS_JOBS).
> Look in $ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/catjobq.sql:
> create public synonym ALL_JOBS for USER_JOBS
> Isn't it a bit misleading? In one of our applications
> user A submits a job and user B removes it by selecting from
> ALL_JOBS - naturally it does not work.
Received on Sat Jun 02 2001 - 09:02:55 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US