Re: limit of varchar2

From: Galen Boyer <galenboyer_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 17 May 2001 22:00:05 -0500
Message-ID: <u4rujfjor.fsf@primix.com>

On Thu, 17 May 2001, dmorgan_at_exesolutions.com wrote:

> No. We solve it by using a larger block size, 16K or 32K or, as
> suggested above, by using a CLOB.

Hm... Okay, but if the block size is already 8, well, I guess CLOB then.

So, the splitting into one-to-one tables is a bad physical design strategy?

-- 
Galen
I don't want to be the rock.  Yeah, okay, what do you want to be?
I want to be the piece of glass.

Received on Thu May 17 2001 - 22:00:05 CDT