Re: Compaq Proliant 3000 server--clarify!!!

Dan,
I am glad no one will be able to give me (as you put it) a "meaningless" answer. I am sorry that your response was so rude. I thought this was an appropriate newsgroup but I guess it is not. I am always amazed how nasty a response can be when someone like me mistakenly asks a question in the wrong group. Did it ruin your machine? Did it cost you money? Was it insulting? Then what is the big deal DAN! I'M SORRY to intrude on your private little group. I guess I'm a sub human not worthy of a post here. Couldn't you just ignore it or was it a great chance to belittle someone and sound like a macho guy.

"Daniel A. Morgan" <dmorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message news:3AF655DB.C3FA2AA4_at_exesolutions.com...
> Mike Taricani wrote:
>
> > That is a 109GB server.
>
> Still meaningless.
>
> Presuming this is a reference to the amount of hard disk ... how much
> RAM, what controller cards and how many, configured into how many
 drives
> of what size and speed? In what configuration? With what network cards
> and on and on and on.
>
> No one here is going to be able to give you a meaningless answer nor,
 if
> you checked the name of the group should you expect one. Contact your
> local Compaq dealer.
>
> I would expect most of us are thinking "What? Get a decent machine
> running Solaris, or HP/UX, or AIX, or anything other than Windoze."
>
> Daniel A. Morgan
>

--