Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Hot-Stdby-DB vs. Parallel-Server

Re: Hot-Stdby-DB vs. Parallel-Server

From: Andrew Mobbs <andrewm_at_chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date: 30 Apr 2001 17:17:58 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <EHp*nq2Uo@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Sybrand Bakker <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote:
>One of the main features of Oracle Parallel Server, is that there are two
>servers serving the same disks.
>Hence the servers need to be in the same computer room.
>A client may not want that for obvious reasons (if there is a fire in the
>computer room, both servers will burn down)
>So, there are cases where Hot Standby is the best you can do.

Fibre attached storage can give you a couple of kilometres between servers (in theory, never seen it implemented myself).

-- 
Andrew Mobbs - http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~andrewm/
Received on Mon Apr 30 2001 - 11:17:58 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US