Re: Comparing Schemas

On 16 Apr 2001, jpoe_at_fulcrumit.com wrote:

> For crying out loud, I was only informing the group on my final
> solution. That is information that is appropriate for this
> group.

I have to say, when I saw your post I thought spam as well. After this post, I then went back and realized it was you replying to your earlier post.

Maybe you could have cited your post as well? Much of the time, if I see text by itself, I think an initial post no matter that the subject is "Re: xxx".

Oh well, I think that is what happened with Daniel as well. On 16 Apr 2001, jpoe_at_fulcrumit.com wrote:

> For crying out loud, I was only informing the group on my final
> solution. That is information that is appropriate for this
> group.

I have to say, when I saw your post I thought spam as well. After this post, I then went back and realized it was you replying to your earlier post.

Maybe you could have cited your post as well? Much of the time, if I see text by itself, I think an initial post no matter that the subject is "Re: xxx".

Oh well, I think that is what happened with Daniel as well.

-- 
I don't want to be the rock.  Yeah, okay, what do you want to be?
I want to be the piece of glass.