Re: MILLION DOLLAR CHALLENGE FROM ORACLE

From: CSC <jcheong_at_cooper.com.hk>
Date: 9 Apr 2001 14:47:42 GMT
Message-ID: <9asi2e$c7l96@imsp212.netvigator.com>

Mon, 09 Apr 2001 11:18:03 GMT Nuno Souto <nsouto_at_nsw.bigpond.net.au.nospam> wrote:
> On 9 Apr 2001 05:16:52 GMT, stolze_at_us.ibm.com (Knut Stolze) wrote:
>

>>It is surely known inside IBM. It was pointed out (at least to me) that the
>>one deciding whether a customer is allowed to participate or not is Oracle!!

>
>
> IMHO, whoever came up with this one at ORACLE should be summarily
> fired. There are many advantages to the 9i distributed cache, and
> there are as many other ways of promoting it than this sort of
> MS-ism...
>

Ellison writes 'The Rules'

http://www.upside.com/texis/mvm/story?id=39e239d70

Read the Fine Print on the "Web Site Performance Guarantee"

http://www.microsoft.com/sql/productinfo/mugresponse.htm

Web caching technology has little to do with database performance. We believe that this is a tactic designed to deflect attention from the fact that competitors regularly outperform Oracle's database technology

-- 
e-Consultant
http://www.asl.com.hk/employment.htm
http://www.eroom.com

Received on Mon Apr 09 2001 - 09:47:42 CDT