Re: Pro's & Con's on Oracle & SQL Svr?

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-family_at_home.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 05:40:46 GMT
Message-ID: <y%Uw6.645411$U46.19833382@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com>

The continually monitor itself and dynamically adjust is a bunch of marketing hooha.

"Daniel A. Morgan" <dmorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message news:3AC40DE3.8C86CE05_at_exesolutions.com...
> > What you say is true. However the implication is open to interpretation.
The
> > SQL Server viewpoint is that it is more efficient (performance-wise) to
have
> > the database continually monitor itself and dynamically adjust its
settings
> > to reflect the load.
>
> Which, of course, explains why no one with SQL Server has ever collected
the
> millions of dollars in prize money Larry Ellison keeps offering if anyone
can
> get SQL Server to run as fast as Oracle.
>
> Daniel A. Morgan
>
Received on Thu Mar 29 2001 - 23:40:46 CST