Re: Terabytes + database on NT

"andrey" <andrey_at_roz.ru> wrote in message news:98ndtq$2rab$1_at_josh.sovintel.ru...
> just purchase PIII 800, NT, and ora 816
> plug in 10 100Gb IBM disks and youv got it
>
> same old simple song for unix ?
>

What drugs are you on, and can I have some of them? HJR
> ""Anurag Minocha"" <aminocha_at_herold.com> wrote in message
> news:EBBA6D3A81229C42981E3AEA79BF5A4E111236_at_jshemail.herold.com...
> > Hi,
> > We are in the process of deciding the operating system to hold our
 database.
> > It is expected that the database will be in Terabytes and will keep on
> > growing at a very fast pace.
> >
> > Is NT the right o/s for this or we should move to unix. If unix then
 which
> > flavor of Unix.
> >
> > I must tell you that the dataase will mainly consist of scanned images.
> > Another solution which is possible to limit the size of the database is
 to
> > store the path of the images in the database and store the images in the
> > file system. In this way we can use NT, but I am not sure of the side
> > effects of this.
> >
> > We are thinking of 8i or later.
> >
> > Please help.
> > Thanks
> > Anurag
> >
> >
> > --
> > Posted from chi6-1.relay.mail.uu.net [199.171.54.98]
> > via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
>
>
Received on Wed Mar 14 2001 - 06:19:07 CST