Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Backups via RMAN or Shell Script
Hey David,
You consistently help people in here...you're allowed one mistake y'know..
Steve
In article <949ksh$fnu$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>,
David Fitzjarrell <oratune_at_aol.com> wrote:
> In our last gripping episode "Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr_at_www.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > "John Jones" <john.jones_at_duke.edu> wrote in message
> > news:946qsh$s4j$1_at_news.duke.edu...
> > > Not trying to be an asshole!! I have seen others mention about
getting
> > > useless information before. If you are not sure of an answer or
in
your
> > > case don't even have 8.1.6, then why answer a question that you do
not
know
> > > for sure. At least I didn't say read the F* manual as most people
do.
> > >
> >
> > I'm only slightly concerned, but I *do* have 8.1.6, and I *do* know
the
> > answer for sure, and catrman.sql really *is* NOT required in 8.1.6,
and
> > therefore I don't know why you think that what I posted was "useless
> > information".
> >
> > Just a thought.
> > HJR
> >
> > > --
> > > John Jones
> > > Senior Oracle DBA
> > > Duke University, OIT
> > > john.jones_at_duke.edu
> > > Howard J. Rogers <howardjr_at_www.com> wrote in message
> > > news:3a66a555_at_news.iprimus.com.au...
> > > > Because you don't need it.
> > > >
> > > > catrman is a script required in the 8.0 implementation of RMAN.
It went
> > > > with 8i.
> > > >
> > > > It was my favourite script name: reminded me of South Park every
time!
> > > >
> > > > And they killed it, the bastards!!
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > HJR
> > > >
> > > > "Erik Zhang" <yzhang3_at_mail.med.upenn.edu> wrote in message
> > > > news:3A64889B.238E6B21_at_mail.med.upenn.edu...
> > > > > Hi, I am interested about your talk about RMAN. I wonder any
of
you
can
tell
> > > > > me where can I find script "catrman.sql". I installed Oracle
8.1.6
> > > > > Enterprise Edition on Window NT, And I cannot get that script
anywhere.
> > > > > thank you.
> > > > > Erik
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> I believe that was directed towards me. I posted, just prior to
yours,
> an apology for the errant 'information' and an explanation of how I
> issued forth with such prose. Essentially I checked on our server
> without checking the documentation and found a copy of the script, in
> the usual location, and thus presumed it was still part and parcel of
> the installation. Silly me.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
Received on Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:29:35 CST