Re: Shutdown Immediate Command

If he has enough transactions going on at once he won't have to wait very long. Only use SHUTDOWN ABORT when nothing else will work. In other words ... after KILL -9 and killing sessions has failed. After the shutdown immediately bring the database back up and perform a normal shutdown.

Daniel A. Morgan

>
> This is one of those things that nobody can "prove" to your
> satisfaction. But if you routinely use shutdown abort, one of these days
> you will be sorry you did.
>
> Van
>
> <jeremiah_at_wolfenet.com> wrote in message news:93vogg$3gn$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
> > In article <93ve7n$prn$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>, David Fitzjarrell
> > <oratune_at_aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The 'shutdown immediate' command is probably your best bet at this
> > > point. There are other 'options', namely 'shutdown abort', however I
> > > would not recommend such a drastic act as 'shutdown abort' does
> > > absolutely no 'bookkeeping' or 'cleanup' whatsoever which could leave
> > > your instance in an unusable (unrecoverable) state.
> >
> > I don't understand the specific scenario you envision in which shutdown
> > abort could "leave your instance in an unusable (unrecoverable) state."
> > I don't believe this is, in fact, the case. One of Oracle's greatest
> > features is its robustness, and the "commit writes redo" rule. This
> > rule allows you to walk up to a running server, unplug it from the wall,
> > plug it back in, and have all the data that was committed before the
> > crash available after the crash.
> >
> > A common misconception holds that shutdown abort is somehow more
> > dangerous or reckless than the other shutdown modes, and can result in
> > data being lost. This is not the case. Shutdown abort terminates the
> > Oracle background and shadow processes, and removes the shared memory
> > segments, effectively terminating a running instance. This leaves all
> > committed transactions intact in the online redologs, even if the data
> > associated with them has not been written to the datafiles. Upon
> > startup, recovery is applied from the online logs beginning from the
> > time of the most recent checkpoint. When recovery is complete, the
> > database is opened for use. Transaction rollback occurs in the
> > background after startup, so no user's time is wasted waiting for all
> > uncommitted transactions to roll back.
> >
> > When starting up after a shutdown abort, the amount of time spent in
> > instance recovery depends largely upon how recently the last checkpoint
> > was issued. By forcing a checkpoint immediately prior to issuing
> > shutdown abort, the redo required to complete crash recovery and bring
> > the database open will be minimal.
> >
> > The alternative in an active environment to shutdown abort is shutdown
> > immediate, but immediate shutdowns take too long, rolling back
> > transactions and performing other tasks while precious seconds pass by.
> >
> > Shutdown abort can come in handy for very brief downtimes, such as those
> > required to change a non-dynamic initialization parameter. In practice
> > on Oracle instances with very large SGAs, such quick "bounces" can
> > typically take as little as 25 seconds.
> >
> > --
> > Jeremiah
> >
> > > In our last gripping episode craig wilson <craig_d_wilson_at_yahoo.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > I have an Oracle Server running Oracle8i on a Solaris Box.
> > > >
> > > > Due to a problem with the redo log, which I do not want to get into
> > > > right now,
> > > > the Oracle Server will "hang" on occassion.
> > > >
> > > > When this occurs I am expected to stop and start the Oracle server.
> > > >
> > > > I have been provided instructions to take in these cases.
> > > > The instructions say to issue a "shutdown immediate;" command after
 I
> > > > have done a "connect internal" command.
> > > >
> > > > The "shutdown immediate;" command appears to hang and do nothing.
> > > > Any other ideas on how to do this.
> > > >
> > > > I'm really an NT/2000/Netware Administrator, so please speak slowly
 and
> > > > clearly since I am a little out of my league on this one :>
> >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com
> > http://www.deja.com/
Received on Mon Jan 15 2001 - 23:50:05 CST