Re: NT vs W2k vs Unix

vslabs_at_onwe.co.za (Billy Verreynne) wrote in <902vrh$rja$1_at_ctb-nnrp2.saix.net>:

>"Erling Sørensen" <hassing_at_mail.tele.dk> wrote
>>
>> I have a question about whith OS is running an Oracle better.
>
>away satan! :-)
>
>> The database is now running under Windows NT 4.0, but I have heard
>> that it would be better to change the OS to Unix. Is that true?
>> In about a year I will change all OS systems on my servers and clients
 from
>> NT and OS/2 to W2k. Should I wait untill then, and run the Oracle
>> under
>W2k?
>
>Before this thread degrades into another one of those tiresome "which
>o/s is the best and has the biggest dick" debates, let me throw in my
>2'c of water on a potential flame hazard...;-)

OpenVMS has the biggest swangin' dick. ;-)

ws

-- 
<< What if there were no hypothetical questions? >>

Warren Spencer
Senior Software Engineer
The Associated Press

** My employer does not necessarily agree with my statements **