Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Raid and ORACLE

Re: Raid and ORACLE

From: <jdarrah_co_at_my-deja.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 15:51:31 GMT
Message-ID: <900ka0$t2p$1@nnrp1.deja.com>

If you multiplex your redo on two seperate raid 0 volumns, you are getting the same protection as putting your redo logs on a 0+1 LUN. Additionally, if there are any kind of OS level io bugs that could cause redo corruption, multiplexing will effectively double the chances that you will have a redo log that is not corrupt (since Oracle issues a seperate write for each log member).

In article <MPG.148c6adb396337d19896b8_at_news.supernews.com>,   Liz Reen <lizr_at_geologist.com> wrote:
> In article <etkr1tkdrf843vuid4emti2v331cqd5kb2_at_4ax.com>,
> kremovethisspamthingthomas_at_gfsiinc.com says...
> > wtf? RAID 1, for redo is only expensive, but it effectively protect
> > your redo from disk failure (RAID 1 is mirroring) - writes are not
> > bad, and an reads can be satisfied from either mirror. Soooo, I
 don't
> > see the big issue with RAID 1, especially since disk is cheap. (you
> > should sitll of course do multiple sets - which ends up costing more
> > in disk).
> >
> > OTOH, you get better performance doing RAID 0 (striping) for redo,
> > and having multiple redo sets.
> >
> > But fired, eventually, why?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 11:55:02 -0600, "Jim DeCicco"
> > <decj1_at_interaccess.com> wrote:
> >
> > >I'd say that using Raid 1 would be closer to the optimal solution
 than it is
> > >to the worst solution.
> > >
> > >Jim
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Using RAID1 for redo log files should be just enough for you and
 your unix
> > >> admin to get fired, eventually.
> > >> --
> > >> Michael O'Neill
> > >> mjoneill_at_email.com
> > >>
> But Raid 0 offers absolutely no fault tolerance. The entire
 stripeset
> dies with the failure of a single disk. Not exactly where I would
 wish
> to put my redo logs or anything else I like. It is great for sort
 disks
> and tempfiles. Things that do not have to be backed up.
>
> My redos live on a striped mirror set. A striped mirror set is
 several
> mirrored disks which are then striped. You can lose one disk in each
 of
> the mirrorsets and still have a stripe set. Given that the costs of
> disks is so cheap there is no reason not to do this. ( When I first
> started in this business 1 gig was $50,000 plus controllers and
 cables)

>

> Liz

>

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy. Received on Tue Nov 28 2000 - 09:51:31 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US