Re: Server size

gorgos_at_my-deja.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
> It wasn't so much storing the entire system on one disk - my main
> question about the disks is: do the system, rbs, temp, redo logs,
> archive logs, each need their own disk ?
>
> In article <972972883.26664.4.pluto.d4ee154e_at_news.demon.nl>,
> "Sybrand Bakker" <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote:
> > What about sending 150 users home after you experience a crash on
 that one
> > single disk?
> >
> > You really should use different disks. The Oracle DBA handbook has a
 nice
> > discussion about the performance reasons.
> >
> > Above I tried to point out that storing a database on 1 disk is a
 reckless
> > act, because that disk is going to be a single point of failure. For
 me
> > that's more than enough reason to justify multiple disks.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sybrand Bakker, Oracle DBA
> >
> > <gorgos_at_my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8tkpe2$8l7
 $1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
> > > Hi,
> > > I've been asked by my finance director to come up with a spec for a
> > > UNIX server for 8i which will also run an ERP system (namely Tetra).
> > > There will be approx 150 users. Cany anyone give me an idea of
 memory,
> > > and processors, plus how many disks does Oracle itself need.
> > > Is there any real benefit in splitting the redo logs, system
 tblspace,
> > > rbs, temp and archive logs onto individual disks for 150 users ?
> > >
> > > Thanks for you help
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > > Before you buy.
> >
> >
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.

Logs definitely...others you *may* be able to get away with it..

HTH

-- 
===========================================
Connor McDonald
http://www.oracledba.co.uk (mirrored at
http://www.oradba.freeserve.co.uk)

"Early to bed and early to rise, 
 makes a man healthy, wealthy and wise." - some dead guy