Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Server size

Re: Server size

From: <gorgos_at_my-deja.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:08:41 GMT
Message-ID: <8tm26n$9g5$1@nnrp1.deja.com>

Hi,
It wasn't so much storing the entire system on one disk - my main question about the disks is: do the system, rbs, temp, redo logs, archive logs, each need their own disk ?

In article <972972883.26664.4.pluto.d4ee154e_at_news.demon.nl>,   "Sybrand Bakker" <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote:
> What about sending 150 users home after you experience a crash on
 that one
> single disk?
>
> You really should use different disks. The Oracle DBA handbook has a
 nice
> discussion about the performance reasons.
>
> Above I tried to point out that storing a database on 1 disk is a
 reckless
> act, because that disk is going to be a single point of failure. For
 me
> that's more than enough reason to justify multiple disks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sybrand Bakker, Oracle DBA
>
> <gorgos_at_my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8tkpe2$8l7
 $1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
> > Hi,
> > I've been asked by my finance director to come up with a spec for a
> > UNIX server for 8i which will also run an ERP system (namely Tetra).
> > There will be approx 150 users. Cany anyone give me an idea of
 memory,
> > and processors, plus how many disks does Oracle itself need.
> > Is there any real benefit in splitting the redo logs, system
 tblspace,
> > rbs, temp and archive logs onto individual disks for 150 users ?
> >
> > Thanks for you help
> >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Before you buy.
>
>

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy. Received on Tue Oct 31 2000 - 03:08:41 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US