Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle or Sybase.

Re: Oracle or Sybase.

From: Sybrand Bakker <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:52:01 +0200
Message-ID: <971288728.6856.4.pluto.d4ee154e@news.demon.nl>

Someday Oracle will just buy them, hehe, like Microsoft does with all its competitors, and as Oracle already did with RdB.

Regards,

Sybrand Bakker, Oracle DBA

"Terry Dykstra" <dontreply_tdykstra_at_cfol.ab.ca> wrote in message news:71%E5.20320$24.4175604_at_news0.telusplanet.net...
> Where does this notion come from that Sybase won't be around as long as
> Oracle? A few years ago they had severe financial problems, but that is
> well behind them now. Version 12 of their database is a solid release. I
> would have no problems going with that.
>
> --
> Terry Dykstra
> Canadian Forest Oil Ltd.
> "FGuelfucci" <guelfucci_at_my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:8s14pb$mtb$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
> > We design in VC++ for Sybase and Oracle and there isn't any great
> > difference when it comes to coding, for this reason I would think that
> > Sybase is fine.
> > On the other hand Sybase will not handle the size of the DB nearly as
> > well as Oracle unless you have a near perfect architecture. This is
> > something you need to take into account if you really expect to grow at
> > 20GB a year.
> > Personally I would go for Oracle as it is more 'stable' and is likely
> > to be around for a while longer than Sybase.
> >
> > Florent Guelfucci
> > Software Engineer
> >
> > In article <8s08iu$kbg$1_at_isdserv3.macbank>,
> > "Rowan McCammon" <rowan.mccammon_at_macquarie.com.au> wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I'm not trying to start a war here but rather am hoping that some
 people in
> > > this group have worked with both Oracle and Sybase and therefore can
 help us
> > > out with a tough decision.
> > >
> > > Situation is we're tossing up whether to go Oracle or Sybase. Ideally
 we'd
> > > like to go with Oracle but licensing cost of Oracle is prohibitive
 compared
> > > with Sybase as company has site license.
> > >
> > > So there would have to be some compelling technical reason to go in
 favour
> > > of Oracle.
> > >
> > > The application is a OLTP system with a user base of about 300-500
 users
> > > (not concurrent).
> > >
> > > The DB contains a BLOB.
> > >
> > > The total size of the DB is expected to be initally about 20GB and is
> > > expected to grow 20GB annually.
> > >
> > > The business would like high availability.
> > >
> > > Based on these broad requirements can anyone see any problems/risks
 going
> > > with Sybase?
> > >
> > > Any comments welcome.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Before you buy.
>
>
Received on Wed Oct 11 2000 - 12:52:01 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US