Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Hard numbers for INITRANS and MAXTRANS

Re: Hard numbers for INITRANS and MAXTRANS

From: Yong <yhuang_at_indigopool.com>
Date: 2000/08/02
Message-ID: <8m9sku$lcn$1@news.sinet.slb.com>#1/1

I've seen cases where increasing INITTRANS solves deadlock problems. Those deadlocks are between two sessions, not self-deadlocks.

Yong Huang

Gocha Mchedlishvili <gocham_at_ixpres.com> wrote in message news:3987611a_6_at_isp.uncensored-news.com...
> I wouldn't recommend changing these parameters unless there are waits in
> v$session_wait on particular object.
>
> Gocha
>
> <vasarpota_at_my-deja.com> wrote in message
 news:8m6l4n$qil$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
> > I understand that INITTRANS and MAXTRANS should be set object by
> > object. Ia also understand that the number are determined by the size
> > of the object and the concurrency for the object. But what hard values
> > are reccomended?
> >
> > I am also assuming that indexes have a higher INITRANS and MAXTRANS
> > than data segments.
> >
> > Do you usually put INITRANS=MAXTRNAS for the more static tables? Is it
> > good practive to always keep the two equal?
> >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Before you buy.
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 -
 http://www.uncensored-news.com
> With Servers In California, Texas And Virginia - The Worlds Uncensored
 News Source
>
Received on Wed Aug 02 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US