Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Larry Ellison comments on Microsoft's benchmark

Re: Larry Ellison comments on Microsoft's benchmark

From: Richard Waymire <rwaymir_at_ibm.net>
Date: 2000/06/27
Message-ID: <eF7VrGI4$GA.79@cppssbbsa05>#1/1

Actually that rule was implemented *AFTER* the benchmark was run....

--
Richard Waymire, MCT, MCSE+I, MCSD, MCDBA
"Serge Rielau" <srielau_at_ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:3958CCCA.694E57B3_at_ca.ibm.com...

> Finally this thread made to the DB2 newsgroup, eh?
>
> Here are my 2 (biased) cents:
> 1. Microsoft was sued over that benchmark because they violated one of
> the rules.
> I.e. SQL Server cannot update the column used to partition the view
> over the
> federated database. The TPC-C benchmark requires updateability of ALL
>
> columns. It seems like they'll get away with flagging their violation
> and a raised
> finger.
> To be fair I should add that updating of partitioning keys is no
> trivial excercise.
> 2. The benchmark did not use mirroring. As stated in earlier posts
> running such a
> beast in a company would be quite - unstable. One has to watch this
> when
> looking at the price/performance numbers.
> 3. Jim Gray said himself that the environment was very hard to set up
> and to keep
> running through the audit.
>
> Finally a federated database is not the same as an MPP system like e.g.
> DB2 EEE.
> In an MPP system the whole query plan gets compiled with MPP in mind and
> parts
> of the execution get distributed to the participating nodes. The whole
> thing is still one database, partitioned tables are still tables and the
> integration is VERY tight.
> A federated database sits on top of other database systems. Parts of the
> query get
> shipped (like SQL Servers pass through queries) to the target systems
> and the
> results get shipped back. On DB2 side this would be Datajoiner or the
> new DB2 V7.1 where SQL queries get reverse engineered post optimization
> and send to the target systems through public interfaces. The connection
> is loose compared to MPP and involves sending the SQL (rather than
> "executable sub query plans"). Partitioned tables are represented as
> views with all their advantages and disadvantages.
>
> just my two cents
> Serge
>
>
Received on Tue Jun 27 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US