Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: MS SQL Server vs Oracle vs DB2 (&Sybase too)

Re: MS SQL Server vs Oracle vs DB2 (&Sybase too)

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: 2000/05/31
Message-ID: <8h2su9$5bi$1@soap.pipex.net>#1/1

Indeed

For an NT server running twin 600Mhz processors. Hardly state of the art

600 * 2 * 15 = $18,000 for standard edition

for enterprise edition

600 * 2 * 100 = $120,000.

less a volume discount of 30k =$90,000

don't want to be buying those quad 800's just yet.

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
"Miguel Cruz" <mnc_at_admin.u.nu> wrote in message
news:xe3Z4.14843$Ym2.339330_at_typhoon2.ba-dsg.net...

> Adam Ruth <aruth_at_intercation.com> wrote:
> > Interesting, but I bet it's still very expensive. It looks like a good
> > move though.
>
> Not cheap, 'tis true. I seem to recall $15 per MHz per CPU for 8i standard
> edition. Then everything else, from support to the actual CDs, is a
separate
> charge.
>
> miguel
Received on Wed May 31 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US