Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: MS SQL Server vs Oracle vs DB2 (&Sybase too)
The Internet Connector license is only valid for connections from OUTSIDE your organization. Internal clients still need to be paid for at regular prices. This one shocked me too, I had to read the license several times to make sure that's what it said.
-- Adam Ruth InterCation, Inc. www.intercation.com "Chad" <cmcleaton_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:8gmamf$6l8$1_at_gaddy.interpath.net...Received on Sat May 27 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT
> I have to disagree with the licensing comment. If you are running
> a web server you can buy an Internet Connector license for SQL Server
> and this allows for unlimited connections to the database server.
>
> On another note, I feel like SQL, Oracle, and DB2 all have their place.
The
> time
> it takes to develop good application and db design is more important than
> which
> DBMS you use. SQL is definitely the best platform in the Intel arena...
> you'd be
> crazy not to seriously consider SQL Server for any application (even if
you
> want
> your web server to run on a Unix box). SQL 7.0 is a real database.. 6.5
> really
> wasn't that great, but SQL 7.0 (and especially the upcoming SQL 2000) will
> do
> anything you need it to do. You get replication, OLAP services and a
number
> of
> other freebies that cost big bucks if you buy Oracle (not sure about
DB2 --
> I don't
> know what they include). It is no brainer..
>
> "Davide Bianchi" <davide_bianchi_at_usa.net> wrote in message
> news:8glsk6$1imtl$1_at_fu-berlin.de...
> > Pay attention also to the client licence fee. I remember that MS want a
> > licence for each CLIENT accessing the database in an Intranet
environment,
> > this means that if you have 1000 users, you need 1000 licences (!!!!).
>
>
>