Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Tablespaces structure question!

Re: Tablespaces structure question!

From: ttrivedi <ttrivedi_at_deja.com>
Date: 2000/04/26
Message-ID: <39070946.6F857615@deja.com>#1/1

Brian,
Hi. Thanks a lot for the insight. Really appreciate the same.

                                                            Tapan


Brian Peasland wrote:

> I had the same problem with a database that I took over. One table per
> tablespace. Also one index per tablespace. Got to be quite a nightmare
> administering the tablespaces. Having one table per tablespace does let
> you easily move tables among volumes. Just take the tablespace offline,
> move the tablespace's datafile to the new location, rename the datafile
> in the database, and bring the tablespace online. Easy to move tables
> without export/import! But other administration tasks can become
> daunting. For example, when trying to trend tablespace growth you have
> to look at a lot of tablespaces rather than just a few. So there are
> pros and cons, but most people would probably say that this is not a
> good thing.
>
> As far as your suggestion on the three tablespaces... I can't say that
> it's wrong (or right). It all depends on your situation. Personally, I'd
> rather put related data into one tablespace. Or use the tablespaces to
> seperate your data based on volume of usage. There are other
> methodologies as well.
>
> HTH,
> Brian
>
> ttrivedi wrote:
> >
> > Hey Gurus,
> >
> > Hi. I have a question which , if answered, might help me clear off some
> > mud in my head.
> > At my present client we have a tablespace structure which comprises of
> > at present
> > each table in its own tablespace. Yes I typed it correctly each table in
> > its own tablespace.
> > What problems ,if any ,do you guys foresee for this type of
> > architecture. One of the suggestions
> > that we have is to have a tablespace structure which elevates the tables
> > as and when they grow.
> > Like we have three tablespaces for the application which are small_tbs,
> > medium_tbs and large_tbs.
> > When the table grows beyond a certain point we move it to the medium and
> > ultimately the large_tbs.
> > What do you guys think of the same ?
> >
> > Any questions, comments, outbursts , epiphanies would be welcome.
> >
> > Tapan
>
> --
> ========================================
> Brian Peasland
> Raytheons Systems at
> USGS EROS Data Center
> These opinions are my own and do not
> necessarily reflect the opinions of my
> company!
> ========================================
Received on Wed Apr 26 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US