Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Why tablespaces still need coalescing

Re: Why tablespaces still need coalescing

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: 2000/03/08
Message-ID: <952500528.7913.1.nnrp-14.9e984b29@news.demon.co.uk>#1/1

The tablespace does not need coalescing. This is NOT because some magic makes
it happen invisibly and automatically, its just because it isn't necessary.

If all extents are the same size, all the holes left by dropping an object are the same size (although adjacent ones will
coalesce as the drop take places, so
some holes will be multiples of the
'unit hole-size'.

Since all the holes are 'the correct size' the next time you create an object, it
will pick some of the available holes
straight away without having to thrash
around looking for a large enough chunk
and without leaving odd little bubbles of space all over the place.

N.B. Have you also set MINIMUM EXTENT
for the tablespace as well is initial, next and pctincrease ?

--

Jonathan Lewis
Yet another Oracle-related web site:  http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Wilko wrote in message <8a4c7n$or49_at_inetbws1.citec.com.au>...

>
>I am using oracle 7.3 and all the extents are the same size
>each tablespace. However, the tablespaces still need coalescing.
>
>Any ideas?
>
Received on Wed Mar 08 2000 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US