Re: All else equal - Dual 800 MHz or Quad 550 MHz Xeons - on NT4.0?

From: DNP <High.Flight_at_btinternet.com>
Date: 2000/03/04
Message-ID: <38C0F166.3E24@btinternet.com>#1/1

Memory may be more important than CPU.

What about licence pricing? The total MHz of CPU on the server can have a large impact on the licence price (at least the minimum licence price). You could find your are in for a nasty shock unless you check this out immediately! Received on Sat Mar 04 2000 - 00:00:00 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: GC: "Re: All else equal - Dual 800 MHz or Quad 550 MHz Xeons - on NT4.0?"
Previous message: Connor McDonald: "Re: All else equal - Dual 800 MHz or Quad 550 MHz Xeons - on NT4.0?"
In reply to: Stephen Wellman: "All else equal - Dual 800 MHz or Quad 550 MHz Xeons - on NT4.0?"
Next in thread: GC: "Re: All else equal - Dual 800 MHz or Quad 550 MHz Xeons - on NT4.0?"
Reply: GC: "Re: All else equal - Dual 800 MHz or Quad 550 MHz Xeons - on NT4.0?"
Reply: Jay M. Scheiner: "Re: All else equal - Dual 800 MHz or Quad 550 MHz Xeons - on NT4.0?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US