Re: Microsoft destroys TPC-C records!

From: Norris <jcheong_at_cooper.com.hk>
Date: 22 Feb 2000 02:30:26 GMT
Message-ID: <88ssc2$1b3n$1@adenine.netfront.net>

Buggy SQL 2000 ?

In comp.databases.sybase workerbee <workerbee_at_pricehive.com> wrote:
> However, if you count in the loss from unexpected and unexplainable crashes
> or downtime, Microsoft is not the cheapest at all.

> --
> the WorkerBee
> http://www.PriceHive.com
> Buy books Online? We compare prices from major online bookstores!

> akmal b chaudhri <akmal_chaudhri_at_my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:88k8mt$fmj$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...

>> In article <38ace385$1$8288_at_readdo01.news>,
>>   "X X" <X_at_X.X> wrote:
>> > Read 'em and weep.
>> >
>> > http://www.tpc.org/new_result/ttperf.idc

>> >
>> >
>>
>> How about using an OLTP benchmark based on some actual performance
>> studies?
>>
>> http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/~akmal/html.dir/citybm.html

>>
>> akmal
>>
>> --
>> [ -- akmal_chaudhri at bigfoot dot com -- ]
>> [ http://www.bigfoot.com/~akmal_chaudhri/ ]
>>
>>
>> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/

>> Before you buy.

--
JULY Received on Mon Feb 21 2000 - 20:30:26 CST