Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: justification of tuning effort

Re: justification of tuning effort

From: Sybrand Bakker <postmaster_at_sybrandb.demon.nl>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:23:42 +0100
Message-ID: <947787921.1583.0.pluto.d4ee154e@news.demon.nl>


Usually the only other option is to buy more hardware, is it not? Also, when you turn on timed_statistics, and your users are running the same query all the time, you should be able to some them decreases in processing time...

Hth,

--
Sybrand Bakker, Oracle DBA
Ed Stevens <Ed.Stevens_at_nmm.nissan-usa.com> wrote in message news:85kvaq$5vm$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
> Ok, I just returned from the Oracle Performance Tuning Workshop. Now
> I'm getting into setting up some monitoring with UTLBSTAT/UTLESTAT, and
> playing around with Oracle Expert and some other OEM tools. Once I've
> got some regular monitoring going on (I'm running BSTAT/ESTAT against
> every database once per week) I'll be ready to attack.
>
> However, in the end I've got to be able to show my boss (and myself,
> and the end user) some meaningful results. Improving hit ratios and
> physical I/O and all the rest is well and good, but at the end of the
> day the only thing that really counts is reducing response time for the
> user. I've been poring over the REPORT.TXT out of UTLESTAT, looking
> for some stats that will be meaningful in this "final analysis." This
> is not to be confused with the wealth of stats that help explain WHY
> the end user is experiencing a certain level of performance. I'm
> looking for the number (or small group of numbers) that can show
> managers and end users that "I made such-and-such change, and here's
> where it improved your performance."
>
> I know that as we get into the thick of tuning and administering a
> database, this can seem overly simplistic, but then I'm trying to show
> results to overly simplistic management/users. The guy who pays the
> bills really doesn't care about "sql area get hit ratios" or "DBWR
> checkpoints" or any of that stuff. All he cares about is how fast he
> gets his results, and why he's running out of disk space. And if they
> feel that current performance levels (whatever they are) are
> acceptable, there is a very good chance that they won't perceive any
> performance improvement as a result of any tuning efforts, leaving me
> wondering how to justify the effort.
>
>
> --
> Ed Stevens
> (Opinions are not necessarily those of my employer)
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
Received on Thu Jan 13 2000 - 12:23:42 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US