Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Database redunancy

Re: Database redunancy

From: TurkBear <johng_at_mm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 15:38:39 GMT
Message-ID: <386787a5.3012371@super.news-ituk.to>


If the fo;ks really want to take this approach, then switch from tnsnames.ora to the Oracle Name server - that way when the new instance is needed, a simple change to the nameserver will redirect the clients to the new location...

Brad <Brad_at_SeeSigIfThere.com> wrote:

>In article <3862258B.29F24895_at_Unforgettable.com>,
>BlueSax_at_Unforgettable.com says...
>> I have been asked to investigate the possability of setting up a
>> fault-tolerant Oracle instance on a Sun 450/SunOS5.6 system. The
>> requirements are somewhat fuzzy, but maybe someone will recognize what I'm
>> trying to accomplish.
>>
>> The system architects want to set up the file system so that it is mirrored
>> to another file system. They would like to have Oracle set up so that if
>> the primary database fails that another instance will be instantly
>> available which uses the mirrored files.
>>
>> In a way this seems to be backwards from parallel server since that schema
>> would use two different instances against the same files. In my case it
>> would be an instance with the same name as the primary instance except that
>> it would be running on another machine (in a cluster configuration).
>>
>> I do see some tremendous problems with this since all of the applications
>> programs are actually running on NT workstations as client applications.
>> Even if I could do the database end I don't see how I could instantly
>> switch users over to the alternate instance without diddling with the
>> tnsnames.ora. If it were simply a matter of having them log in different by
>> specifying a difference database alias I could see how that could be
>> handled, but I didn't write the login screens and the database alias is
>> hardcoded into one of the programs and is handled by a global configurator
>> for the other applications. Considering that the current usages is about
>> 80-100 call-center agents, it would appear to me that the deck is stacked
>> against me for any type of automated switchover.
>
>The machine that takes over needs to takeover the IP address of the
>crashed machine.

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------    http://www.newsfeeds.com The Largest Usenet Servers in the World! ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including Dedicated Binaries Servers ==----- Received on Mon Dec 27 1999 - 09:38:39 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US