Re: datablocks

From: Ulrik Lunddahl <lunddahl_at_post1.tele.dk>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 23:14:02 +0100
Message-ID: <821oeh$23b$1@news.inet.tele.dk>

Kevin A Lewis <Kevin_A_Lewis_at_Hotmail.com> wrote:

> If so I might either go for 2048 (2K) or maybe 4096 based on what you have
> said.

Also consider your hardware, read the documentation for the disc/raid controller, what is the smallest 'get' supported ?

I myself have never seen any oracle database perform 'good' under Windows NT with under 8K block size, but then again I have not seen so many, and they are all BMS databases, and do all have fairly many fields pr. row.

--
Kind Regards

Ulrik Lunddahl
lunddahl_at_post1.tele.dk

Notice: Spelling mistakes left in for people who need to correct others to make their life fulfilled. Received on Tue Nov 30 1999 - 16:14:02 CST