Re: Windows NT Server vs Windows NT Server Enterprise version

I also agree that NT is not the choice for the number of expected users. Unix is the OS of choice for the perfmance required for that load if they are all concurrent users.

m

Sybrand Bakker wrote in message
<942617553.22891.0.pluto.d4ee154e_at_news.demon.nl>...
>I agree with not seeing a performance boost.
>However there are also two editions of Oracle, and IMO he was also
referring
>to that.
>The Oracle Server Software doesn't contain amongst others
>Parallel Query Option (takes advantage of multiple cpus by distributing
>work)
>Objects Option
>Advanced Replication Option
>Oracle Failsafe (for NT clusters)
>
>He is definitely going to need the Enterprise Edition of Oracle.
>Personally I doubt whether NT is capable of handling 80-90 users, I would
>have choosen an Unix port.
>
>Hth,
>
>
>--
>Sybrand Bakker, Oracle DBA
>James VanHof <jvhsite_at_NOSPAM.home.com> wrote in message
>news:382F3343.B75FB5F9_at_NOSPAM.home.com...
>> I believe NT server enterprise edition consists of NT server 4.0 plus a
>> package of addons such as SQL , Exchange, Proxy, etc. Therefore you
>> would not see a performance boost over NT Server 4.0 if you purchased NT
>> Server 4.0, Enterprise edition because NT is the same with both
>> packages.
>>
>>
>> Jim vh
>>
>> "Pearapon S." wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear All,
>> > WE are planning to use Windows NT Server and Oracle DB to
>handle
>> > Client/Server Applications.
>> > The NT Server will have to handle about 80-90 users concurrently via
>> > Oracle's Client/Server Applications.
>> > 1) What should we use "Windows NT Server" Standard version
>or
>> > Enterprise version to handle these workload ?
>> > 2) What types of CPUs (Speed and number ) and memory should
>we
>> > use for the Server ?
>> > 3) Do we need to buy Speciall version of Oracle to handle
>these
>> > workload ?
>> >
>> > Thank you very much in advance.
>> > Regards,
>> > Pearapon S.
>> > pearapon_at_ksc.th.com
>
>
Received on Sun Nov 14 1999 - 17:20:30 CST