Re: Asynch. Replication for failover site

From: <dalalbm_at_my-deja.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 21:06:34 GMT
Message-ID: <7v2goo$o2t$1@nnrp1.deja.com>

This one is not on NT but on Solaris. Mirroring/RAID4 seems to be better solution for protection against disk failure. We are planning this one now.

As I understand, in mirroring/RAID4(hardware) solution, failover(in case of Disk Failure) need not be planned, as OS itself will take care of that, right ?

Thanks for your valuable time and inputs, guys.

-Bipin.

In article <7ul4c5$ju4$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>, dalalbm_at_my-deja.com wrote:
> We are planning to use asynchronous(5 mins.) replication for a
failover
> site to minimize data loss at the time of failure.
>
> Our problem is how to streamline sites once the primary site is up
> again. We want users to continue using failed over site for new
> transactions.
>
> Can anybody have done this before ?
>
> Thanks in anticipation.
>
> -Bipin.
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
>

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy. Received on Mon Oct 25 1999 - 16:06:34 CDT