Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Redo latch tuning question

Re: Redo latch tuning question

From: <ashokbh_at_my-deja.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 20:40:49 GMT
Message-ID: <7t368f$h8e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>


Just increase the LOG_SIMULTANEOUS_COPIES to 2 * CPU.

It will help

Ashok

In article <37F4C91B.E1FEC77A_at_fas.harvard.edu>,   Anne Hanson <ahanson_at_fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On one of my servers, I have heavy contention for redo copy latches.
The
> gets/misses ratio is extremely poor. The immediate gets/misses ratio
is
> fine. The redo allocation latch is not experiencing any contention.
I'm
> running 8.0.5 on NT 4.0. I've been reading up on latches, and the two
> solutions I've seen suggested are:
>
> 1) Increase the LOG_SIMULTANEOUS_COPIES initialization parameter to 2
*
> number of CPUs. Right now it is 2, as the server has 2 CPUs.
>
> 2) If the above doesn't help, increase the LOG_SMALL_ENTRY_MAX_SIZE so
> more redo entries will be handled by the redo allocation latch.
>
> Does anyone know of any down side to either of these solutions, or
> anything else I should be thinking of? Thanks in advance for any tips,
>
> Anne
>
>

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy. Received on Fri Oct 01 1999 - 15:40:49 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US