Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: HELP: RAID-5 Killing Performance

Re: HELP: RAID-5 Killing Performance

From: Chris Forlano <cforlano_at_nortelnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 11:36:40 +0100
Message-ID: <37DF76B8.8F4E41BE@nortelnetworks.com>


Sybrand,

Isn't it generally a bad idea to have the archive files and redo logs on the same device?
Which should get the priority?

Thanks for your comments.

Chris

Sybrand Bakker wrote:

> Consider moving the Oracle software to disk1 or disk2,
> the online redologs definitely to disk3.
> I would not archive to tape directly, this is usually too slow. Then the
> archiver will become your bottleneck.
> For the rest the setup is adequate.
>
> Hth,
Received on Wed Sep 15 1999 - 05:36:40 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US