Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Problems with Production running slower than Development.

Re: Problems with Production running slower than Development.

From: <michael_bialik_at_my-deja.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 22:19:48 GMT
Message-ID: <7qk8pp$a3o$1@nnrp1.deja.com>


Hi.

 Look at the output of
 SELECT * FROM V$SYSTEM_EVENT(S) ORDER BY 4 DESC  Can you post the results?

  Michael.

In article <aD0z3.2409$E46.2878_at_news.rdc1.pa.home.com>,   "Bob Fazio" <bob_fazio_at_hotmail.com.no.spam> wrote:
> db_block_size 16K
> I did do a check and I am only using currently (after a few days up
and
> running, we re-booted) about 15% of the 300M in my SGA.
>
> Hit ratio's I'm not sure, but the numbers I saw were acceptable, but
not
> great(guessing 90%). Again the system has only been back up for a
few days,
> and they are in between runs. Just one run a week.
>
> Very few extents, even in the data dictionary. I think that the max
there
> was about 30. The rest of the tables, are all under 10.
>
> No row chaining.
>
> I am going to increase the db_block_buffers, and see what effect it
has.
>
> Thanks.
>
> <michael_bialik_at_my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:7qhe50$7cj$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
> > Hi.
> >
> > 1. Try to increase you SGA to 1Gb at least ( you have 8
> > of them in PROD - use it ).
> > Increase the number of db_block_buffers ( you didn't
> > specified what is you db_block_size ).
> > If it 2K - then you are using 2K * 3200 = 6400K = 6.4M
> > of you buffer pool now.
> > Even if it is 16K then you are using about 50M out of 300M.
> > Increase it to 12800 ( to be on a safe side - do it step by
step ).
> > You can increase it even more after increasing SGA size.
> >
> > 2. Check your hit ratios ( data and dictionary ). You are supposed
> > to achieve > 90% at least ( > 95% is tuned system ).
> >
> > 3. Do you have a lot of extents? It may cause performance
> > degradation.
> >
> > 4. Do you have row-chaining?
> >
> >
> > Good luck. Michael.
> >
> > In article <j%Hy3.2259$E46.1895_at_news.rdc1.pa.home.com>,
> > "Bob Fazio" <bob_fazio_at_hotmail.com.no.spam> wrote:
> > > I realize how hard it is to tune without all the information.
But if
> > you
> > > have any insight it would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > I have to instances, dev and production. Dev on a 4500 and Prod
on a
> > 6500
> > > (SUN)
> > >
> > > The 4500 (4 processors and 4GB Ram) 6500 (8 processors and 8GB of
> > RAM)
> > >
> > > The obvious problem (which I am resolving) is that I am I/O bound,
> > and I am.
> > > I am working on resolving that as I write this. I was hoping
some of
> > the
> > > other things might be obvious to someone.
> > >
> > > shared_pool_size 300M - prod and 60Meg Dev
> > > db_block_buffers 3200 - prod and 1000 - Dev
> > > log_buffer 163840 prod and 252144 - dev (not running archivelog in
> > either
> > > instance)
> > >
> > > sort_area_size 6M prod 5M dev
> > > sort_area_retained_size 6M prod 1M dev
> > >
> > > The following are set in production , but left to the defaults in
dev.
> > >
> > > sort_write_buffer_size 2M
> > > optimizer_search_limit 10
> > > bitmap_merge_area_size 2m
> > > hash_multiblock_io_count 64
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bob Fazio
> > > rfazio_at_home.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
>

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't. Received on Wed Sep 01 1999 - 17:19:48 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US