Re: C++ to Oracle Server

I would use a TP monitor for mission-critical high-volume applications. So, what's the point you're trying to make? It is NOT true that you "inevitably" lose performance when going through multiple layers of software. The least a TP monitor (as f.i. MTS, to name the cheapest) can do, is give you connection pooling/sharing. That way, this "extra layer" will dramatically increase performance.

--
Dirk Bellemans
Modify email address to reply (use .be instead of .belgium)

dgallardo_at_my-deja.com wrote in message <7p9gtj$d0r$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>...
>Fast? What do you mean by fast? You inevitably lose performance if you
>have to go through multiple layers of software. ODBC is probably
>adequate for many or even most applications, but I wouldn't use it for
>mission-critical high-volume applications.
>
>In article <7p3e09$12$1_at_news1.skynet.be>,
> "Dirk Bellemans" <Dirk.Bellemans_at_skynet.belgium> wrote:
>
>> What's wrong with ODBC? As long as you use a good driver (Intersolv,
>f.i.)
>> and with bulk row fetching, it is fast.
Received on Tue Aug 17 1999 - 09:19:37 CDT